Infact
Infact Get the full experience — check any claim instantly
Open
72
Mostly True Los Angeles

Meta and YouTube were found liable in a social media addiction trial, resulting in a $6 million damages award for a young woman named Kaley. The jury determined that Meta and Google acted with malice, oppression, or fraud, with Meta responsible for 70% of the damages.

The claims regarding the social media addiction trial involving Meta and YouTube are largely supported by multiple independent sources. Meta and YouTube were found liable, and Kaley was awarded $6 million in damages, with Meta responsible for 70% of the amount. The jury also found that Meta and Google acted with malice, oppression, or fraud. However, there is no evidence to verify the specific ages at which Kaley started using Instagram and YouTube. Overall, the evidence strongly supports the claims about the trial's outcomes and liabilities.

March 27, 2026 Language: en 5 claims analyzed

Individual Claims

85
True Technology
Meta and YouTube were found liable in a social media addiction trial.
Multiple sources confirm that Meta and YouTube were found liable in a social media addiction trial. CBS News and PBS report that the jury found these companies liable for creating addictive platforms that harmed young users. This is corroborated by Fortune, which also mentions the pending punitive damages.
Fact Check Score None
Fact Check Weight 0
Web Consensus Score 95
Web Consensus Weight 50
Source Quality Score 90
Source Quality Weight 25
Llm Reasoning Score 85
Llm Reasoning Weight 25
Weighted Total 85
Evidence Summary 3 web sources confirm liability of Meta and YouTube.
85
True Legal
Kaley was awarded $6 million in damages in the trial against Meta and YouTube.
Web evidence from Kursiv Media and Daily Journal confirms that Kaley was awarded $6 million in damages. This is supported by WUSF, which also reports the same amount awarded in the trial against Meta and Google.
Fact Check Score None
Fact Check Weight 0
Web Consensus Score 95
Web Consensus Weight 50
Source Quality Score 90
Source Quality Weight 25
Llm Reasoning Score 85
Llm Reasoning Weight 25
Weighted Total 85
Evidence Summary 3 web sources confirm $6 million damages awarded to Kaley.
79
Mostly True Legal
Meta and Google acted with malice, oppression, or fraud according to the jury.
The New York Post and EPIC confirm that the jury found Meta and Google acted with malice or highly egregious conduct. This is further supported by Fox Business, which reports the jury's finding of malice, oppression, or fraud.
Fact Check Score None
Fact Check Weight 0
Web Consensus Score 90
Web Consensus Weight 50
Source Quality Score 85
Source Quality Weight 25
Llm Reasoning Score 80
Llm Reasoning Weight 25
Weighted Total 79
Evidence Summary 3 web sources confirm jury's finding of malice by Meta and Google.
79
Mostly True Legal
Meta will shoulder 70% of Kaley's damages award.
Evidence from CNBC and NPR confirms that Meta is responsible for 70% of the damages awarded to Kaley. CapRadio also supports this, noting Meta's significant share of the liability.
Fact Check Score None
Fact Check Weight 0
Web Consensus Score 90
Web Consensus Weight 50
Source Quality Score 85
Source Quality Weight 25
Llm Reasoning Score 80
Llm Reasoning Weight 25
Weighted Total 79
Evidence Summary 3 web sources confirm Meta's responsibility for 70% of damages.
31
Mostly False Technology
Kaley started using Instagram at age nine and YouTube at age six.
No evidence was found to verify or refute the specific ages at which Kaley started using Instagram and YouTube. The evidence provided is unrelated to the claim about Kaley's social media usage history.
Fact Check Score None
Fact Check Weight 0
Web Consensus Score None
Web Consensus Weight 50
Source Quality Score 50
Source Quality Weight 25
Llm Reasoning Score 50
Llm Reasoning Weight 25
Weighted Total 31
Evidence Summary No evidence found to verify or refute this claim.

Try Infact

Instant AI-powered fact-checking — on any platform

Chrome Extension WhatsApp Telegram Telegram Group Telegram Channel