Rüdiger Safranski critiques Germany's 'firewall' policy against the AfD, highlighting polarization and political constraints.

The analysis of the claims reveals varying degrees of evidence and verification challenges. The claim about Germany's increasing polarization is strongly supported by multiple sources highlighting political tensions and voter behavior. The opinion on gender-inclusive language being nearly regarded as fascist lacks empirical evidence due to its subjective nature. The claim about the CDU's political constraints during coalition governance is corroborated by evidence detailing the coalition's impact on party roles. The prediction concerning the AfD and a 'new Berlin Wall' metaphorically evolving lacks verification due to its speculative nature and need to forecast future events. Lastly, the opinion about the AfD's legitimacy as a democratic component remains subjective, as such views are contingent on personal and political beliefs.