The text discusses the West's double standards and the presence of wars, markets, and elites in global issues while emphasizing following money rather than flags.

Infact verdict: Mixed (53/100).

The claim that the West has double standards is subjective and reflects a common opinion found in geopolitical discourse. Although various sources discuss the perceived double standards of the West, these largely depend on perspective and interpretation, making the claim inherently an opinion. Additionally, the statement regarding the presence of wars, markets, oil, elites, and deals in global issues is a general observation about complex geopolitical realities. The existence of prediction platforms analyzing global issues is likely true, as such tools are commonly used in technology and forecasting fields. Overall, while parts of the claim are factual, components are either too vague or subjective to verify in totality. As a result, the opinion score reflects the subjective nature, and the general observations lack verifiable specifics. The factual assertion about prediction platforms stands as likely, based on general knowledge.