78
Mostly True
Washington
A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration's use of federal data for voter roll checks, citing legal violations and privacy concerns.
The claims regarding the Trump administration's use of federal data for voter roll checks are largely supported by multiple sources, including NPR, The New York Times, and other reputable outlets. These sources confirm that a federal judge ruled against the administration's actions, citing violations of privacy and administrative laws. The evidence consistently supports the claims that the actions were unlawful and that the systems developed were flawed, potentially disenfranchising eligible voters. Overall, the claims are well-supported by the evidence provided.
Individual Claims
80
True
Politics
A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration's provision of federal data to states to check and purge their voter rolls violated several laws.
The claim is supported by evidence from multiple sources, including NPR and The New York Times, which report that Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ruled against the Trump administration's use of federal data for voter roll checks, citing violations of privacy and administrative laws. This aligns with the claim that the action violated several laws.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
90
Web Consensus Weight
50
Source Quality Score
85
Source Quality Weight
25
Llm Reasoning Score
80
Llm Reasoning Weight
25
Weighted Total
80
Evidence Summary
Multiple sources confirm the ruling against the Trump administration's use of federal data for voter roll checks.
80
True
Politics
Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ordered the Homeland Security Department to stop permitting states to search the data.
The claim is corroborated by evidence from NPR and The New York Times, which report that Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ordered the halt of the use of the SAVE system by the Department of Homeland Security for voter roll checks, citing legal violations.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
90
Web Consensus Weight
50
Source Quality Score
85
Source Quality Weight
25
Llm Reasoning Score
80
Llm Reasoning Weight
25
Weighted Total
80
Evidence Summary
Multiple sources confirm Judge Sooknanan's order to stop the use of federal data for voter roll checks.
76
Mostly True
Politics
President Trump ordered several agencies to pool data that states could use to verify citizenship.
The claim is supported by evidence from NPR and the Brennan Center for Justice, which report that the Trump administration developed a system to pool federal data for verifying voter citizenship, facing legal challenges over privacy concerns.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
85
Web Consensus Weight
50
Source Quality Score
80
Source Quality Weight
25
Llm Reasoning Score
75
Llm Reasoning Weight
25
Weighted Total
76
Evidence Summary
Multiple sources confirm Trump's order to pool data for citizenship verification.
72
Mostly True
Politics
The executive order resulted in a rush by agencies to adopt a flawed system that would flag eligible voters along with those who might have registered illegally.
The claim is supported by evidence from NPR and other sources, which report that the system developed under Trump's executive order was criticized for being flawed and potentially disenfranchising eligible voters.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
80
Web Consensus Weight
50
Source Quality Score
75
Source Quality Weight
25
Llm Reasoning Score
70
Llm Reasoning Weight
25
Weighted Total
72
Evidence Summary
Multiple sources report on the flawed nature of the voter verification system.
80
True
Politics
The repurposing of the immigration database into a tool to check voter eligibility unlawfully abused sensitive data stored by the government.
The claim is supported by evidence from NPR and The New York Times, which report that the repurposing of the SAVE database for voter eligibility checks was ruled unlawful by a federal judge due to privacy violations.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
90
Web Consensus Weight
50
Source Quality Score
85
Source Quality Weight
25
Llm Reasoning Score
80
Llm Reasoning Weight
25
Weighted Total
80
Evidence Summary
Multiple sources confirm the unlawful repurposing of the SAVE database.
