50
/ 100
Mixed
China
A farmer in China cut off his finger after a snake bite, but doctors said the bite was not seriously poisonous.
Infact verdict: Mixed (50/100).
Both claims lack external evidence. The claim about the farmer cutting off his finger after a snake bite is plausible but unverifiable without evidence. Similarly, the claim that doctors said the snake bite was not seriously poisonous cannot be confirmed. Without evidence, both claims are treated as unverifiable.
How is this score determined? →Individual claims
50
Mixed
World
A farmer in China cut off his own finger after a snake bite.
No external evidence was found to verify this claim. It is plausible but unverifiable without evidence.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
None
Web Consensus Weight
0
Source Quality Score
50
Source Quality Weight
0
Llm Reasoning Score
50
Llm Reasoning Weight
100
Llm Reasoning Score Raw
50
Weighted Total
50
Evidence Summary
No evidence found.
50
Mixed
Health
Doctors said the snake bite showed no serious poison.
No external evidence was found to verify this claim. It is plausible but unverifiable without evidence.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
None
Web Consensus Weight
0
Source Quality Score
50
Source Quality Weight
0
Llm Reasoning Score
50
Llm Reasoning Weight
100
Llm Reasoning Score Raw
50
Weighted Total
50
Evidence Summary
No evidence found.
