59
/ 100
Mixed
Germany
The text discusses the influence of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) on political decisions, noting its high approval ratings in some states and the fear it generates among other parties. It questions the sufficiency of democracy and the rejection of positions aligning with AfD views.
Infact verdict: Mixed (59/100).
The claims regarding the AfD's influence and approval ratings are supported by evidence. The AfD has over 40% approval in some eastern states, and its influence is causing political decisions to be made out of fear. Positions aligning with the AfD are often rejected due to its extremist views. The claim about the AfD continuing its activities despite potential bans is a prediction and cannot be verified. The opinion on democracy is subjective and cannot be fact-checked.
How is this score determined? →Individual claims
91
True
Politics
The Alternative for Germany (AfD) has more than 40% approval ratings in some states.
Multiple sources confirm that the AfD has over 40% approval ratings in some eastern states like Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia. This is supported by recent polls and corroborated by reliable sources such as CSIS and TVP World.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
90
Web Consensus Weight
40
Source Quality Score
85
Source Quality Weight
20
Llm Reasoning Score
80
Llm Reasoning Weight
40
Llm Reasoning Score Raw
80
Weighted Total
91
Evidence Summary
3 web sources confirm AfD's high approval ratings in eastern states.
66
Mostly True
Politics
Decisions are made out of fear of the AfD.
Evidence suggests that political decisions are influenced by fear of the AfD's electoral strength. Sources like Fondapol and ESI indicate that the party's rise has prompted actions to counter its influence.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
75
Web Consensus Weight
40
Source Quality Score
70
Source Quality Weight
20
Llm Reasoning Score
65
Llm Reasoning Weight
40
Llm Reasoning Score Raw
65
Weighted Total
66
Evidence Summary
2 web sources indicate decisions influenced by fear of AfD.
59
Mixed
Politics
A political position is rejected only because it aligns with the AfD’s views.
Sources like DW News and ICCT indicate that positions aligning with the AfD are often rejected due to its extremist views. This is supported by evidence of the AfD's exclusion from mainstream politics.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
65
Web Consensus Weight
40
Source Quality Score
60
Source Quality Weight
20
Llm Reasoning Score
55
Llm Reasoning Weight
40
Llm Reasoning Score Raw
55
Weighted Total
59
Evidence Summary
2 web sources support rejection of positions aligning with AfD.
27
Mostly False
Politics
The AfD will continue its activities even if isolated or banned.
This is a prediction about future events and cannot be verified. Current evidence shows the AfD continues its activities despite surveillance and calls for a ban, but future actions remain speculative.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
None
Web Consensus Weight
40
Source Quality Score
None
Source Quality Weight
20
Llm Reasoning Score
50
Llm Reasoning Weight
40
Llm Reasoning Score Raw
50
Weighted Total
27
Evidence Summary
Prediction about AfD's future activities; current evidence shows continued activity.
50
Mixed
Politics
A functioning democracy is no longer enough.
This is an opinion about the state of democracy and cannot be fact-checked. Opinions are subjective and not verifiable as true or false.
Fact Check Score
None
Fact Check Weight
0
Web Consensus Score
None
Web Consensus Weight
0
Source Quality Score
None
Source Quality Weight
0
Llm Reasoning Score
50
Llm Reasoning Weight
100
Llm Reasoning Score Raw
None
Weighted Total
50
Evidence Summary
None
