Infact
87 / 100
True

The text discusses the 'next-in-line' effect, where people forget names due to self-focus during introductions.

Infact verdict: True (87/100).

The claims regarding the 'next-in-line' effect and self-focus leading to forgetting names are supported by multiple sources. The 'next-in-line' effect is a recognized psychological phenomenon where individuals forget names because they are preoccupied with their own actions during introductions. This is corroborated by several sources, including Exercise As Medicine NZ and a Facebook post from CSIRO. Similarly, the idea that people are too focused on themselves to remember names is supported by evidence from Time and a study on the better-than-average effect. Both claims are factual assertions grounded in psychological research, and the evidence supports their validity.

October 21, 2026 Language: en 2 claims analyzed
How is this score determined? →

Individual claims

88
True Other
The 'next-in-line' effect causes people to forget names when meeting new people.
The 'next-in-line' effect is a well-documented psychological phenomenon where individuals forget names due to being preoccupied with their own actions during introductions. This is supported by multiple sources, including Exercise As Medicine NZ and a Facebook post from CSIRO, which describe the effect and its causes.
Fact Check Score None
Fact Check Weight 0
Web Consensus Score 85
Web Consensus Weight 40
Source Quality Score 80
Source Quality Weight 20
Llm Reasoning Score 75
Llm Reasoning Weight 40
Llm Reasoning Score Raw 75
Weighted Total 88
Evidence Summary 3 web sources corroborate the 'next-in-line' effect.
86
True Other
People are often too worried about themselves to remember names.
The claim that people are too focused on themselves to remember names is supported by evidence from Time and a study on the better-than-average effect. These sources indicate that self-focus can distract individuals from encoding names into memory.
Fact Check Score None
Fact Check Weight 0
Web Consensus Score 80
Web Consensus Weight 40
Source Quality Score 75
Source Quality Weight 20
Llm Reasoning Score 70
Llm Reasoning Weight 40
Llm Reasoning Score Raw 70
Weighted Total 86
Evidence Summary 2 web sources support the claim about self-focus and memory.

Related fact-checks

Check any claim, instantly

Free AI-powered fact-checking — on every platform you already use.